Flores v. Horizons Research Laboratories, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Flores v. Horizons Research Laboratories, Inc.

588 So. 2d 1099, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12026, 1991 WL 253844

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 4, 1991

DocketNo. 91-0694

StatusPublished

This text of 588 So. 2d 1099 (Flores v. Horizons Research Laboratories, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flores v. Horizons Research Laboratories, Inc., 588 So. 2d 1099, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12026, 1991 WL 253844 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was entitled to notice from his withdrawing attorney and from the trial court in allowing the withdrawal. Neither the attorney’s motion nor the trial court’s order reflects such notice to have been given. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Clement v. Marcus, Stowell & Beye, Inc., 516 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was entitled to notice from his withdrawing attorney and from the trial court in allowing the withdrawal. Neither the attorney’s motion nor the trial court’s order reflects such notice to have been given. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Clement v. Marcus, Stowell & Beye, Inc., 516 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

588 So. 2d 1099, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12026, 1991 WL 253844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flores-v-horizons-research-laboratories-inc-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack