Flores v. Horizons Research Laboratories, Inc.
588 So. 2d 1099, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12026, 1991 WL 253844
Opinion
Appellant was entitled to notice from his withdrawing attorney and from the trial court in allowing the withdrawal. Neither the attorney’s motion nor the trial court’s order reflects such notice to have been given. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Clement v. Marcus, Stowell & Beye, Inc., 516 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Flores v. Horizons Research Laboratories, Inc., 588 So. 2d 1099, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12026, 1991 WL 253844 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
588 So. 2d 1099 (Flores v. Horizons Research Laboratories, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clement v. Marcus, Stowell & Beye, Inc.
516 So. 2d 1137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)