Flores v. Holder

565 U.S. 1190, 132 S. Ct. 1551
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Flores v. Holder. Read the opinion of the Court — 566 U.S. 984
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 21, 2012·No. No. 11-7665·Published

Opinion

[1190]*1190C. A. 9th Cir.; and

[1191]*1191No. 11-7888.

C. A. 9th Cir. Mo­tions of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As peti­tioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal mat­ters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flores v. Holder, 565 U.S. 1190, 132 S. Ct. 1551 (2012).

565 U.S. 1190 (Flores v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)