Flores v. George Braun Packing Co.

Fifth Circuit

Flores v. George Braun Packing Co.

482 F.2d 279

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJuly 17, 1973

DocketNo. 73-1489

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 482 F.2d 279 (Flores v. George Braun Packing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flores v. George Braun Packing Co., 482 F.2d 279 (5th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiffs, slaughterhouse workers who are on strike against their employers, contend that the Immigration and Nationality Act, i. e., 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(a) (15) (a) (ii), 1182(a) (14), and 1324, and the regulations implementing those provisions, 29 C.F.R. § 60.1, et seq., create a private right of action against their employers, based on the alleged employment of Mexican nationals who illegally entered the United States. We follow the holding of the Tenth Circuit in Chavez v. Freshpict Foods, Inc., 456 F.2d 890 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1112, 93 S.Ct. 925, 34 L.Ed.2d 695 (1973), which determined that no such private remedy exists.

The order of the district court dismissing the complaint is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiffs, slaughterhouse workers who are on strike against their employers, contend that the Immigration and Nationality Act, i. e., 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(a) (15) (a) (ii), 1182(a) (14), and 1324, and the regulations implementing those provisions, 29 C.F.R. § 60.1, et seq., create a private right of action against their employers, based on the alleged employment of Mexican nationals who illegally entered the United States. We follow the holding of the Tenth Circuit in Chavez v. Freshpict Foods, Inc., 456 F.2d 890 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1112, 93 S.Ct. 925, 34 L.Ed.2d 695 (1973), which determined that no such private remedy exists.

The order of the district court dismissing the complaint is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

482 F.2d 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flores-v-george-braun-packing-co-ca5-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack