Flores v. Bachmann-Errerick Factors Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida

Flores v. Bachmann-Errerick Factors Corp.

199 So. 763, 145 Fla. 464, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 719

DecidedJanuary 14, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 199 So. 763 (Flores v. Bachmann-Errerick Factors Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flores v. Bachmann-Errerick Factors Corp., 199 So. 763, 145 Fla. 464, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 719 (Fla. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of tire judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Buford, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur. Justices Whitfield, Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of tire judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Buford, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur. Justices Whitfield, Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 So. 763, 145 Fla. 464, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flores-v-bachmann-errerick-factors-corp-fla-1941.