Flores v. Attorney General

473 F. App'x 5
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedAugust 1, 2012
DocketNo. 12-5053
StatusPublished

This text of 473 F. App'x 5 (Flores v. Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flores v. Attorney General, 473 F. App'x 5 (D.D.C. 2012).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed January 19, 2012 be affirmed. The court correctly held that a pro se litigant may not prosecute a case in federal court on behalf of others, see 28 U.S.C. § 1654, the complaint is in any event clearly frivolous, and no certification to the Supreme Court is warranted.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 F. App'x 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flores-v-attorney-general-dcd-2012.