Flores-Rosales v. Geo Group, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Flores-Rosales v. Geo Group, Inc.

210 F. App'x 271

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 20, 2006·No. No. 06-7214·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ruben Flores-Rosales appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Flores-Rosales v. GEO Group, Inc., 5:04-ct-000623-H (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 22, 2004 & entered Dec. 8, 2004; June 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ruben Flores-Rosales appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Flores-Rosales v. GEO Group, Inc., 5:04-ct-000623-H (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 22, 2004 & entered Dec. 8, 2004; June 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Flores-Rosales v. Geo Group, Inc., 210 F. App'x 271 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

210 F. App'x 271 (Flores-Rosales v. Geo Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related