Flores, Reynaldo

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 22, 2015·No. WR-79,171-05·Published

Opinion

22 257 777/222 @ECEWED m

GR)MWAM FEAL@ ////7515 Cf.///??/FFCA?MM/A/ IF/»”€A?R §MAY 72 757 P

/7%37.5!/ 75XA§ 7 /§7@“

2 l MA@@#S?@,©§@U

777`%7/7£/`,2 /15725§ 1 - 057/1775 §2//71!7/72/71/

752€27 717?‘“

17/777774/ 72 027/27 26 222/2525 ~ .. -, " 127/725 7777’2':,,2,,1172/772:2/ 2721/57 [ 7//77 727727/7'59] '_ 2:_~

§§ ` -_ 7“/7“77 2222/25272/22/777>57£*» 7'-*7)77§ 2/§ _ ';i/“//22727/

f /7/2///2/”, 777/717 /MMQL)$. , 2

" ` ”‘W@WE ~“ 377 403 \2717?"/ 777/1,{¢177'57/,£ 772 75/77§, 792/7 ’1772/ 20522277, 2775 271 2775/my 27??7’)

)‘225 2 , j//?'

75 2772/773 "'i?§¥ll<;“%v. 772 77 72/_§

5 ~¢ 5712`.~? 222 _. 2257 527/1 /<2// 727

161[<1:/) /)1/§11 )€1101/“7'“1/77[71 115/411 1///1

`_§’-Q)L @F;SZ,Q

Dc?re

11@“/111“101575)`(£

,11'/11`1’ 1511 1111/3111795$111 en 1125 fig

; 7117/bi §1 M/)§;A/, 1,€)[ 111/05&1)/)7 W§ar 11/%5 1711 ’ 115 1?116j 11/§1% 1111 j €Z§/ize¢z/ 591 7_<'___7/ _ _ -.171€0”;/[§?1&€;/:7:4@

gy[/g, a .` ji/ % /!/L" ~7‘711/57£%`/\ 121 1111 /1 11“§1/:1')11 1117 115/1711

_A~’/J .

§10? 71¢ 1195 11§11/ 711/1 1314/119wa 71?%€111“ 11 .1 111 11 '1'/’ 11 7 " * 115 111111/11 1531 ;’ M1111/ .,.'1 1111111111¢ » '

1161/567 1121 111/111 » * F ,/@W” MM . _".._.M._… , __ 1171/1 419 11 M1111 1111 111/11 1~“;/6,7`1’/1 e/;‘z’£

W% 7§{ %11//1&11{1/ 11]§:1¢/’ //1)€’771§ 1/1/~1//¢ /1/1//.11/16€!-{ f 1111 %/" 111

11 cF//~“g_/_/ _ » 1 » 611£1:1;‘1 1117 1 1111 1 ~"”.J

1011§ 1 ”11(12/'{’% Udf - 1 1511 111 1111 116 /111111111‘/ 111/11 f1f1/)1/ 1115’_

'_1<"/~'

7/4 " 470 ofac/447 ..>% %/44/ ///Z§//vm/z€r’ . _ _ 4

/§:;W/:%S) 474 07:{%/441/6/ v/// 1’;$4/),5"72 4€/;%509 445 “ 7 7

/@\1_//,@)0/§ ' 71 MZ 777/1496!5'41’07,§'4?7,1 .»S

445 '4"74'4§/)`[’4 '~ 144/

7§§.§§,

194 /74 444 §§ 1 541/444 §“'¢7”?7g 743”'§ 44 4§»[4444444@4/4¢& 44444444444)

/[//7// ,€§6 13 L

l 711/4 1@441'4/7% 77¢?)14§119 471/1114 4/5/@7 /4?1{4/4% ;I/§f/ 14 §j/:;§zb :7711§7;/77/

jai/f 1795/444/

:;77 7 4744/451/7/4447,:)”77,4 €/ jf ) 4/;414/1"7 /1; 44147/17/11171‘7% 441/474774//1

§11:71;1471 7/1/4;414§ 1114/44/41/4144 1‘/11 1114 771/1114 4444;14; 1111 411/115

/§/247'% 7 52 l/A& ngm'/€/ ./3 :9*4441/ 6/§40`@.'4)'//1"1 51 §§ 1’. , ' f 411 41 4'%'74"1§» z??/:;o ' ' " ‘?'411$7 11 4 74 191§;7£7 14`9%11 4 §1§129 .. . 1 {c/ 7(4 755_)7;‘7}11 §WW'%§; N%//f:€ 1 Pz/M%/? 444 44414411€: . 4 44§1141€ 4444’1z 4411;@11.1_1 ' 541/74 445 414/ [41.,1 445/44§1/$/ /WW 15

57 414/114 §4;;4 191/44//, 7@?£ Gj&§”@ 4/§/!41 4 1 45 BW 577

414 411'414¢41 44 111111,11111

§§/W4 1%4;4

4 1 1/%117¢7§/441 444/1 '

7 ...»~~.; 7.77 777 il@r[ a// W/ 1 d ,7; v/1r/0,. ;74 ;6 4147;77 dQQ;Z //?/M

/1, ms&z,l M/ fdng 1714/177

40'§ 1 ~ 41 1444

712175 jj

fir/guy 177-1717 /,/.’ M,

141/44 1554

/%11`1€4&{44/4/4 ," 1 , 77 7 117/ 1 `~ 61&$ 41 ~, 7 7 7, __ 77 7_ 14 / 7/£/%7:,?§ 1 /74.§6{§_6 /7/; 54/ 7 7 777 an /m/D ,» ZIFJ ._ 7/, _ 7 §4416 1464,4/146§4 ”M. 7 7 7 77 444 4¢1“44‘ 445 111 4€537,77 _7__7_ 7 7 _ _7

` 010§5’

05 307 '@z§ am j /s’f J//§)QIZ/ z / ,0'~00 - ~ “ ’[5,2* MQQ/ f 5 555 ‘ 04 /Lz%`i c£z:z,. :}5;5£¢¢% 35~

. zizzo %S/?/000[0000;,3 *:MW» ch './/% ` ‘_ 55 555 355 55 5 1 - *e. .

. a b " f l 5

f + 5 a , 5 ~,QM~ ,~ 555 %55 525 551/755 55 5 v _ 5 y 0 lt a‘ 4 ,. " § l ./`,

0'0§U ‘

gm ~z“@/z:/&$ wm /%'00% 7’ @//00@407?214,

z Ol, ». n . U'€»Q.,JZ? 005?2:§ £355°%”5 1952 _ ' 552-555sz 0/21/ 0/¢"~ v/M § 7%5& ’gz?[M/[p Z%;[/j// b '_ /M¢/¢;Z(Zd _M,

»0/ "/0/2€/0!:§002/) £§’

601/5/1”/;1114/ _ l 7%1@1411“ 1`- 7‘/~ 4797%1>%7€4/57“,§ /S`

` `@”f§”/§”w' § ” M»Q/" §§ )0%:;::[ 01 f` .

1/54,7%4 144 016 1 137416’ 1

V/Z€§!k MJ§§ aff/ig d/C , _' l 1 pp {':"__1,1‘1, g

§ 1441§7 111 14.

§§@ f*W §%[g? ea

/4@!1’”?""6' "

[7[7!7/04 11/621 "

Q€MM A?.e:£€i¢“

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION ' REYNALDO FLQRES, t § Plaintiff, § ' _ VS. § ClVlL ACTION NO. 2:15-CV-134 R VARA, et al, § Defendant. §

OPINION AND ORDER OF TRANSFER

This action was initiated by Reynaldo Flores, who is incarcerated at TDCJ-Cll)’s 'Cotulla Transfer Facility in LaSalle County, Texas (D.E. l). Though the action was filed

as a lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Flores appears to be challenging the validity of

his conviction, as well as seeking monetary and injunctive relief against the named ll ll

Defendants, and_b;, requests the filing of` criminal charges against the Defendants. Flores

named as Defendants a former and present Bexar County Assistant District Attorney, his trial counsel, the"forernan of '»the lBexar-County Grand Jury, and several San Antonio- Police Department officers and detectives Plaintiff was convicted in Bexar County in 2010 and 20111 of Assault-Family Violence, and is serving prison terms related to those

convictions (D.E. l).l

' The TDCJ website lists Plaintiff`s holding convictions, but does not mention the length of his sentences http://of`fender.tdcj.state.tx.us/OffenderSearch.

l/3

A civil action wherein jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of` citizenship may be brought in (l) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the Same state, or '(2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred. 28 U.S.C. § l391(b). Almost all of the Defendants in this case are located in Bexar County, 'l`exas,2 and the events giving rise to the lawsuit occurred there. Bexar County is located in the San Antonio Division of the Western District of Texas. 28 U.S.C. § 124(d)(4). Flores is incarcerated in the Laredo Division of the Southern District of Texas. 28 U.S.C. § 124(b)(3).

On the other hand, to the extent that Flores is challenging his conviction, the matter sounds in habeas and may be filed either in the district where petitioner is in custody or in the district in which he was convicted. 28 U.S.C. § 224l(d); Wadsworth v. Johnson, 235 F.3d 959 (5th Cir. 2000).

For the convenience of parties and witnesses, and in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been b_rought. 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). §ecause most of the Defendants are located in the San Antonio Division of the Western District of Texas, and the records of Flores’s conviction and the witnesses are located there, it is more convenient and would further

the interests of justice for this action to be handled in the San Antonio Di_vision,

regardless of whether it is treated as a habeas petition or a civil rights lawsuit.

2 Pl`aintiff does complain that one witness, Edward Garcia, lived in Corpus Christi, Texas, but the events that led to the criminal charges occurred in Bexar County, Texas (D.E. l at pp. 3-18).

2/3

Accordingly, the Clerk shall transfer this action to the San Antonio Division of the -'Western District of Texas. All pending motions are denied as moot, subject to being

reactivated after the transfer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI