Flores-Hernandez v. Mukasey

Ninth Circuit

Flores-Hernandez v. Mukasey

319 F. App'x 496

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 22, 2009

DocketNo. 06-73565

StatusPublished

This text of 319 F. App'x 496 (Flores-Hernandez v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flores-Hernandez v. Mukasey, 319 F. App'x 496 (9th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Laura Flores-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review questions of law de novo. Altamirano v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 586, 591 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA correctly affirmed the IJ’s removal order based on its prior determination that Flores-Hernandez was ineligible for cancellation of removal. See Lolong v. Gonzales, 484 F.3d 1173, 1175 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc) (BIA need not remand to the IJ for issuance of a removal order where a determination of removability was already made by the IJ).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI