Flores-Flores v. Sessions
This text of 687 F. App'x 599 (Flores-Flores v. Sessions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jose Clemente Flores-Flores, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Ap[600]*600peals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.
We deny Flores-Flores’s petition for review because he does not make any arguments challenging the agency’s dispositive adverse credibility determination. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-1080 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are deemed waived).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
687 F. App'x 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flores-flores-v-sessions-ca9-2017.