Florentino v. Johnson

499 S.W.3d 777, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 982, 2016 WL 5724973
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 4, 2016
DocketNo. ED 103856
StatusPublished

This text of 499 S.W.3d 777 (Florentino v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florentino v. Johnson, 499 S.W.3d 777, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 982, 2016 WL 5724973 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

Dr. Randy Johnson appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting Her-nando Florentino and Mare Florentino a new trial following a jury verdict in favor of Appellant in a medical malpractice case. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court acted within its discretion and did not abuse its discretion. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
499 S.W.3d 777, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 982, 2016 WL 5724973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florentino-v-johnson-moctapp-2016.