Florentino Reyes Santana v. Paul J. Schriner, Deputy Warden Attorney General

24 F.3d 249, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18867, 1994 WL 196768
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 18, 1994
Docket93-15360
StatusPublished

This text of 24 F.3d 249 (Florentino Reyes Santana v. Paul J. Schriner, Deputy Warden Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florentino Reyes Santana v. Paul J. Schriner, Deputy Warden Attorney General, 24 F.3d 249, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18867, 1994 WL 196768 (9th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

24 F.3d 249w
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Florentino Reyes SANTANA, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Paul J. SCHRINER, Deputy Warden; Attorney General,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 93-15360.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 11, 1994.*
Decided May 18, 1994.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 F.3d 249, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18867, 1994 WL 196768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florentino-reyes-santana-v-paul-j-schriner-deputy--ca9-1994.