Florentino Reyes Santana v. Paul J. Schriner, Deputy Warden Attorney General

Ninth Circuit

Florentino Reyes Santana v. Paul J. Schriner, Deputy Warden Attorney General

24 F.3d 249, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18867, 1994 WL 196768

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 18, 1994·No. 93-15360·Published

Opinion

24 F.3d 249w
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Florentino Reyes SANTANA, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Paul J. SCHRINER, Deputy Warden; Attorney General,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 93-15360.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 11, 1994.^*
Decided May 18, 1994.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

24 F.3d 249w
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Florentino Reyes SANTANA, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Paul J. SCHRINER, Deputy Warden; Attorney General,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 93-15360.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 11, 1994.^*
Decided May 18, 1994.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Florentino Reyes Santana v. Paul J. Schriner, Deputy Warden Attorney General, 24 F.3d 249, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18867, 1994 WL 196768 (9th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

24 F.3d 249 (Florentino Reyes Santana v. Paul J. Schriner, Deputy Warden Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.