Florence v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedMay 18, 2016
Docket15-255
StatusUnpublished

This text of Florence v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Florence v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florence v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2016).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

******************** * JANET FLORENCE, * No. 15-255V * Special Master Christian J. Moran Petitioner * * v. * Filed: April 21, 2016 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Damages; decision based on proffer; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * influenza (“flu”) vaccination; * lymphedema. Respondent. * ******************** *

Lawrence R. Cohan, Anapol Weiss, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner; Heather L. Pearlman, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On March 12, 2015, Janet Florence filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 et seq., alleging that the influenza vaccination caused her to suffer lymphedema. On May 28, 2015, the undersigned ruled, based upon respondent’s concession, see Respondent’s Report, filed May 19, 2015, that petitioners are entitled to compensation under the Vaccine Act.

On April 21, 2016, respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation, to which petitioner agrees. Based upon the record as a whole, the special master finds the proffer reasonable and that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the attached Proffer the court awards petitioner: 1 The E-Government Act, 44 § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website. 1. A lump sum payment of $258,381.93, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Janet Florence. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a), except as set forth below in paragraph 2; and

2. An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract as described in section II. B. of the Proffer.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 15-255V according to this decision and the attached proffer.2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Dan Hoffman, at (202) 357- 6360.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS _______________________________________ JANET FLORENCE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 15-255V ) Special Master Moran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) ECF SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) )

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

Respondent engaged life care planner M. Virginia Walton, RN, MSN, FNP, CNLCP, and

petitioner engaged Roberta Hurley, Hurley Consulting, to provide an estimation of Janet

Florence’s future vaccine-injury related needs. For the purposes of this proffer, the term

“vaccine related” is as described in the respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report, filed on May 19, 2015.

All items of compensation identified in the life care plan are supported by the evidence, and are

illustrated by the chart entitled Appendix A: Items of Compensation for Janet Florence, attached

hereto as Tab A. 1 Respondent proffers that Janet Florence should be awarded all items of

compensation set forth in the life care plan and illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A.

Petitioner agrees.

1 The chart at Tab A illustrates the annual benefits provided by the life care plan. The annual benefit years run from the date of judgment up to the first anniversary of the date of judgment, and every year thereafter up to the anniversary of the date of judgment.

-1- B. Lost Earnings

The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, Janet Florence has not suffered

a past loss of earnings and will not suffer a loss of earnings in the future. Therefore, respondent

proffers that Janet Florence should not be awarded lost earnings as provided under the Vaccine

Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Petitioner agrees.

C. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that Janet Florence should be awarded $200,000.00 in actual and

projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and

suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner

agrees.

D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Petitioner represents that she has not incurred past unreimbursable expenses related to her

vaccine-related injury.

E. Medicaid Lien

Petitioner represents that there are no Medicaid liens outstanding against her for her

II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made

through a combination of lump sum payments and future annuity payments as described below,

and request that the Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: 2

2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.

-2- A. A lump sum payment of $258,381.93, representing compensation for life care

expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($58,381.93) and pain and

suffering ($200,000.00), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Janet Florence.

B. An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract, 3 subject to the conditions

described below, that will provide payments for the life care items contained in the life care plan,

as illustrated by the chart at Tab A, attached hereto, paid to the life insurance company 4 from

which the annuity will be purchased. 5 Compensation for Year Two (beginning on the first

anniversary of the date of judgment) and all subsequent years shall be provided through

respondent’s purchase of an annuity, which annuity shall make payments directly to petitioner,

Janet Florence, only so long as she is alive at the time a particular payment is due. At the

Secretary’s sole discretion, the periodic payments may be provided to petitioner in monthly,

quarterly, annual or other installments. The “annual amounts” set forth in the chart at Tab A

describe only the total yearly sum to be paid to petitioner and do not require that the payment be

made in one annual installment.

3 In respondent’s discretion, respondent may purchase one or more annuity contracts from one or more life insurance companies. 4 The Life Insurance Company must have a minimum of $250,000,000 capital and surplus, exclusive of any mandatory security valuation reserve.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Florence v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florence-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2016.