Florence v. Potter
This text of Florence v. Potter (Florence v. Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1020
LESTER FLORENCE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General; UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-02-624-1)
Submitted: May 28, 2004 Decided: July 1, 2004
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas B. Kobrin, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Joan B. Binkley, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Lester Florence appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action arising out
of Florence’s termination from employment. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Florence v. Potter,
No. CA-02-624-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Florence v. Potter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florence-v-potter-ca4-2004.