Florence Discount Co. v. Morris

Alabama Court of Appeals

Florence Discount Co. v. Morris

129 So. 923, 24 Ala. App. 634

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 1930

Docket8 Div. 890.

StatusPublished

This text of 129 So. 923 (Florence Discount Co. v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florence Discount Co. v. Morris, 129 So. 923, 24 Ala. App. 634 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

This was a suit by appellant against appellee for an amount due on a negotiable promissory note.

Appellant was, as we read the record, shown by the undisputed testimony to be a “holder in due course” of the instrument sued on. Code 1923, § 9078. And it was also without dispute that the same was due and unpaid.

We find nothing in the record justifying the refusal of the trial court to give to the jury, at appellant’s request, the general affirmative ’charge, with hypothesis, to find in its favor; and for the error in its refusal the judgment must be and is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

This was a suit by appellant against appellee for an amount due on a negotiable promissory note.

Appellant was, as we read the record, shown by the undisputed testimony to be a “holder in due course” of the instrument sued on. Code 1923, § 9078. And it was also without dispute that the same was due and unpaid.

We find nothing in the record justifying the refusal of the trial court to give to the jury, at appellant’s request, the general affirmative ’charge, with hypothesis, to find in its favor; and for the error in its refusal the judgment must be and is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 So. 923, 24 Ala. App. 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florence-discount-co-v-morris-alactapp-1930.