Florence Cement Co. v. Vettraino
292 Mich. App. 801, 2011 Mich. App. LEXIS 2393
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Florence Cement Co. v. Vettraino. Read the opinion of the Court — 292 Mich. App. 461 →
Opinion
The Court orders that the May 3, 2011, opinion is hereby amended. The opinion contained the following clerical errors:
The defendant’s last name was misspelled. The correct spelling is “Vettraino.”
On page 3, the slip opinion states, “It is undisputed that Comerica provided the remaining $142,000 requested, and that this amount, but only this amount, was paid to Florence, leaving a shortfall of $142,557.27.” The shortfall amount should correctly be $114,557.27.
In all other respects, the May 3, 2011, opinion remains unchanged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Florence Cement Co. v. Vettraino, 292 Mich. App. 801, 2011 Mich. App. LEXIS 2393 (Mich. Ct. App. 2011).
292 Mich. App. 801 (Florence Cement Co. v. Vettraino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.