Florant v. State

849 So. 2d 1181, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11082, 2003 WL 21697187
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 23, 2003·No. No. 3D02-207·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George Saint Florant appeals his convictions for armed robbery, home-invasion robbery, kidnapping, and burglary with an assault. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The State concedes that the home invasion conviction is subsumed within the conviction for burglary with an assault. Weiss v. State, 720 So.2d 1113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). We remand for the striking of the home-invasion robbery conviction, and for a new sentencing hearing on a recalculated guidelines scoresheet.

We find no merit to the claim of discovery error under Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971). Assuming for purposes of this discussion that the error was chargeable to the State, rather than a failure to communicate between defense co-counsel, the error was in any event corrected when the trial court made provision for the defense to take the deposition of the witness whom the defense had not previously been able to depose. This was an entirely appropriate solution, and there was no defense objection to this procedure.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florant v. State, 849 So. 2d 1181, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11082, 2003 WL 21697187 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

849 So. 2d 1181 (Florant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reynolds v. SV CENTRAL DANIA PROPERTIES
849 So. 2d 1181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)