Floran v. State

918 So. 2d 382, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20378, 2005 WL 3556033
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 2005·No. No. 2D05-1339·Published

Opinion

ALTENBERND, Judge.

Earl E. Floran appeals an order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence that was filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s ruling concerning Mr. Flo-ran’s argument that the trial court did not use the appropriate scoresheet. We reverse the trial court’s refusal to consider Mr. Floran’s challenge to his sexual predator designation. In light of our recent decision in King v. State, 911 So.2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), the trial court must consider challenges to sexual predator status under rule 3.800(a).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CANADY and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Floran v. State, 918 So. 2d 382, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20378, 2005 WL 3556033 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

918 So. 2d 382 (Floran v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. State
911 So. 2d 229 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)