Floral Trade Council v. United States

17 Ct. Int'l Trade 915

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Floral Trade Council v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 822 F. Supp. 766 →

United States Court of International Trade·Decided August 16, 1993·No. Court No. 92-06-00393·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

Restani, Judge:

This case having been submitted for decision and the Court, after deliberation, having rendered a decision therein; now, in conformity with that decision,

It is hereby ordered : that a remand determination having been issued finding the “all other” rate to be 18.20%, and no objections having been filed, it is hereby

Further ordered that the ITA’s remand determination is sustained and that an 18.20% rate shall be applied as the cash deposit “all other” rate for future entries.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

Restani, Judge:

This case having been submitted for decision and the Court, after deliberation, having rendered a decision therein; now, in conformity with that decision,

It is hereby ordered : that a remand determination having been issued finding the “all other” rate to be 18.20%, and no objections having been filed, it is hereby

Further ordered that the ITA’s remand determination is sustained and that an 18.20% rate shall be applied as the cash deposit “all other” rate for future entries.

Floral Trade Council v. United States, 17 Ct. Int'l Trade 915 (cit 1993).

Pincite

17 Ct. Int'l Trade 915 (Floral Trade Council v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.