Floral Arts Studio v. United States
62 Cust. Ct. 1079, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3336
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 15, 1969
DocketNo. P69/94; protest 67/55675 (Los Angeles)
StatusPublished
This text of 62 Cust. Ct. 1079 (Floral Arts Studio v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Floral Arts Studio v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 1079, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3336 (cusc 1969).
Opinion
In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that tlie merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of rice paper similar in all material respects to that the subject of Floral Arts Studios and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., et al. v. United States (49 Cust. Ct. 43, C.D. 2359), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Floral Arts Studios v. United States
49 Cust. Ct. 43 (U.S. Customs Court, 1962)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
62 Cust. Ct. 1079, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floral-arts-studio-v-united-states-cusc-1969.