Flora v. Rogers

619 N.E.2d 690, 67 Ohio St. 3d 441
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 13, 1993·No. No. 93-611·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its decision.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flora v. Rogers, 619 N.E.2d 690, 67 Ohio St. 3d 441 (Ohio 1993).

619 N.E.2d 690 (Flora v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Medlar
2012 Ohio 935 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)
People Ex Rel. Sxm
271 P.3d 1124 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2011)
Ganim v. Ganim, Unpublished Decision (5-26-2006)
2006 Ohio 2874 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
State ex rel. Richard v. Seidner
1996 Ohio 54 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Howard v. Catholic Social Services of Cuyahoga County, Inc.
70 Ohio St. 3d 141 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)
Howard v. Catholic Social Serv. of Cuyahoga Cty., Inc.
1994 Ohio 219 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)
State ex rel. Pirman v. Money
1994 Ohio 208 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)