Flora Goldman v. Solomon E. Shahmoon

Second Circuit

Flora Goldman v. Solomon E. Shahmoon

323 F.2d 366

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedOctober 18, 1963

Docket28370_1

StatusPublished

This text of 323 F.2d 366 (Flora Goldman v. Solomon E. Shahmoon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flora Goldman v. Solomon E. Shahmoon, 323 F.2d 366 (2d Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

323 F.2d 366

Flora GOLDMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Solomon E. SHAHMOON et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 129, Docket 28370.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 18, 1963.
Decided Oct. 18, 1963.

Sidney L. Garwin, New York City, for plaintiff-appellee.

Julius Zizmor New York City, for defendants-appellants.

Before WATERMAN, HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In open court we affirm the judgment below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

323 F.2d 366

Flora GOLDMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Solomon E. SHAHMOON et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 129, Docket 28370.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 18, 1963.
Decided Oct. 18, 1963.

Sidney L. Garwin, New York City, for plaintiff-appellee.

Julius Zizmor New York City, for defendants-appellants.

Before WATERMAN, HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In open court we affirm the judgment below.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

323 F.2d 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flora-goldman-v-solomon-e-shahmoon-ca2-1963.