Flood v. Johnston

Michigan Supreme Court

Flood v. Johnston

258 Mich. 354

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 6, 1932

DocketDocket No. 166, Calendar No. 36,245

StatusPublished

This text of 258 Mich. 354 (Flood v. Johnston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flood v. Johnston, 258 Mich. 354 (Mich. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Sharpe, J.

The contract which plaintiff here seeks to have canceled and declared null and void is similar in all respects to that entered into between Mary Fetters and Johnston in Fetters v. Wittmer Oil & Gas Properties, ante, 310. In that case it was held to be void as against public policy. The decree of the trial court holding it to be null and void in this case is affirmed, with costs to appellee.

Clark, C. J., and McDonald, Potter, North, Fead, Wiest, and Butzel, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharpe, J.

The contract which plaintiff here seeks to have canceled and declared null and void is similar in all respects to that entered into between Mary Fetters and Johnston in Fetters v. Wittmer Oil & Gas Properties, ante, 310. In that case it was held to be void as against public policy. The decree of the trial court holding it to be null and void in this case is affirmed, with costs to appellee.

Clark, C. J., and McDonald, Potter, North, Fead, Wiest, and Butzel, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 Mich. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flood-v-johnston-mich-1932.