Flomenhaft v. United States

27 Cust. Ct. 320, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1062
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 20, 1951
DocketNo. 55891; petition 6800-R (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 27 Cust. Ct. 320 (Flomenhaft v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flomenhaft v. United States, 27 Cust. Ct. 320, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1062 (cusc 1951).

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

The importer testified that he entered the merchandise on the basis of the invoice price of 35.60 francs per dozen, the actual amount he paid for the goods; that after filing a submission sheet, the appraiser indicated to [321]*321him that the prices were higher in France; that thereupon he made inquiries of the manufacturer in France and was informed that the goods this manufacturer made for him were of a cheaper quality, made solely for export to the United States; that he disclosed this information to the appraiser; and that he then referred the matter to his broker, who suggested that, as the goods imported were different from those sold in the home market, a test case be made, entering at the invoice value. Subsequently, the appraiser advised the petitioner that he wanted the merchandise entered on the basis of foreign value and the broker thereupon filed an appeal for reappraisement. Upon the record presented it was held that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to deceive the Government officials. The petition was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Cust. Ct. 320, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flomenhaft-v-united-states-cusc-1951.