Flomarcy Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

324 F.2d 730
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 22, 1963·No. Nos. 29, 30, Dockets 27961, 27962·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Flomarcy Company, Inc. and its controlling shareholders appeal from a decision of the Tax Court, T.C.Memo. 19G2-201, upholding the assessment of deficiencies against the petitioners for failure to report income which the company had earned but which petitioners had caused to be paid to third parties. The taxpayers introduced no evidence, and it is well settled that deficiency assessments of the Commissioner are presumptively correct. Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115, 54 S.Ct. 8, 78 L.Ed. 212 (1933); Brown v. Commissioner, 141 F.2d 307, 309 (2 Cir. 1944). The argument made on this appeal that the government should have the burden of proof because a constructive dividend is a legal fiction is without legal or logical basis. The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flomarcy Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 324 F.2d 730 (2d Cir. 1963).

324 F.2d 730 (Flomarcy Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related