Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Floding v. American Machinery Co.

Floding v. American Machinery Co.

102 S.E. 193, 24 Ga. App. 766, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 511
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 10, 1920
Docket11072
StatusPublished

This text of 102 S.E. 193 (Floding v. American Machinery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Floding v. American Machinery Co., 102 S.E. 193, 24 Ga. App. 766, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 511 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Smith, J.

There was evidence to support the finding of the judge of the municipal court of Atlanta, who tried the case without a jury; and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari, .based on the general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenhins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 S.E. 193, 24 Ga. App. 766, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floding-v-american-machinery-co-gactapp-1920.