Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 3, 2016
Docket124
StatusPublished

This text of Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc. (Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc., (N.Y. 2016).

Opinion

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------

No. 124 Flo & Eddie, Inc., a California Corporation, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Respondent, v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Appellant, Does, 1 through 10, Defendants.

Jonathan Hacker, for appellant. Harvey Geller, for respondent.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Certification of question by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, pursuant to section 500.27 of this Court's Rules of Practice, accepted and the issues presented are to be considered after briefing and argument. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

Decided May 3, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flo-eddie-inc-v-sirius-xm-radio-inc-ny-2016.