Flippins v. West Terre Haute Lumber Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Flippins v. West Terre Haute Lumber Co.

128 N.E. 771, 75 Ind. App. 207, 1920 Ind. App. LEXIS 323

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 23, 1920

DocketNo. 10,562

StatusPublished

This text of 128 N.E. 771 (Flippins v. West Terre Haute Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flippins v. West Terre Haute Lumber Co., 128 N.E. 771, 75 Ind. App. 207, 1920 Ind. App. LEXIS 323 (Ind. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

McMahan, J.

The only question which appellant attempted to present which has any merit, is that the court erred in its conclusions of law.

[208]*208.Instead of excepting to the conclusions of law and assigning as error in this court, that the court erred in its conclusions of law, appellant seeks to present the question through her motion for a new trial. This can not be done. Midland R. Co. v. Dickason (1892), 130 Ind. 164, 29 N. E. 775.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMahan, J.

The only question which appellant attempted to present which has any merit, is that the court erred in its conclusions of law.

[208]*208.Instead of excepting to the conclusions of law and assigning as error in this court, that the court erred in its conclusions of law, appellant seeks to present the question through her motion for a new trial. This can not be done. Midland R. Co. v. Dickason (1892), 130 Ind. 164, 29 N. E. 775.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 N.E. 771, 75 Ind. App. 207, 1920 Ind. App. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flippins-v-west-terre-haute-lumber-co-indctapp-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack