Flippins v. West Terre Haute Lumber Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Flippins v. West Terre Haute Lumber Co.

128 N.E. 771, 75 Ind. App. 207, 1920 Ind. App. LEXIS 323

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided November 23, 1920·No. No. 10,562·Published

Opinion

McMahan, J.

The only question which appellant attempted to present which has any merit, is that the court erred in its conclusions of law.

[208]*208.Instead of excepting to the conclusions of law and assigning as error in this court, that the court erred in its conclusions of law, appellant seeks to present the question through her motion for a new trial. This can not be done. Midland R. Co. v. Dickason (1892), 130 Ind. 164, 29 N. E. 775.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMahan, J.

The only question which appellant attempted to present which has any merit, is that the court erred in its conclusions of law.

[208]*208.Instead of excepting to the conclusions of law and assigning as error in this court, that the court erred in its conclusions of law, appellant seeks to present the question through her motion for a new trial. This can not be done. Midland R. Co. v. Dickason (1892), 130 Ind. 164, 29 N. E. 775.

Judgment affirmed.

Flippins v. West Terre Haute Lumber Co., 128 N.E. 771, 75 Ind. App. 207, 1920 Ind. App. LEXIS 323 (Ind. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

128 N.E. 771 (Flippins v. West Terre Haute Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related