Flintkote Co. v. State Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Flintkote Co. v. State Division of Human Rights

64 A.D.2d 660, 407 N.Y.S.2d 243, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12482

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 24, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 64 A.D.2d 660 (Flintkote Co. v. State Division of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flintkote Co. v. State Division of Human Rights, 64 A.D.2d 660, 407 N.Y.S.2d 243, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12482 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated November 29, 1977, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated February 14, 1977, which, after a hearing, inter alia, found that the petitioner had discriminated against the complainant, Joseph P. Hopkins, on the basis of his age and had unlawfully discharged him from employment. The State division has cross-applied for enforcement of its order. Order confirmed, proceeding dismissed and cross application granted, without costs or disbursements. The determination of the State Division of Human Rights that complainant’s termination was motivated by age discrimination was supported by sufficient evidence within the meaning of section 298 of the Executive Law. Latham, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated November 29, 1977, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated February 14, 1977, which, after a hearing, inter alia, found that the petitioner had discriminated against the complainant, Joseph P. Hopkins, on the basis of his age and had unlawfully discharged him from employment. The State division has cross-applied for enforcement of its order. Order confirmed, proceeding dismissed and cross application granted, without costs or disbursements. The determination of the State Division of Human Rights that complainant’s termination was motivated by age discrimination was supported by sufficient evidence within the meaning of section 298 of the Executive Law. Latham, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 A.D.2d 660, 407 N.Y.S.2d 243, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flintkote-co-v-state-division-of-human-rights-nyappdiv-1978.