Flint v. Norwich and Worcester Railroad
110 Mass. 222
Opinion
It does not appear that there was any fault in the management of the cars, or that they were the cause of the accident. There was not sufficient evidence to authorize a verdict for the plaintiff. Judgment for the defendant».
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Flint v. Norwich and Worcester Railroad, 110 Mass. 222 (Mass. 1872).
110 Mass. 222 (Flint v. Norwich and Worcester Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kunkle v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
88 S.E. 113 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1916)
Lepard v. Michigan Central Railroad
130 N.W. 668 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)
Everett v. Great Northern Railway Co.
111 N.W. 281 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1907)
Patnoude v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad
61 N.E. 813 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)
Southern Railway Co. v. Cooper
36 S.E. 388 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1900)
Butcher v. West Virginia & P. R.
18 L.R.A. 519 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1892)
Norton v. Eastern Railroad
113 Mass. 366 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1873)