Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

657 A.2d 642, 233 Conn. 905, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 153
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedApril 24, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 657 A.2d 642 (Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., 657 A.2d 642, 233 Conn. 905, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 153 (Colo. 1995).

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 162 (AC 12907), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[906]*906Decided April 24, 1995 William F. Gallagher and Cynthia C. Bott, in support of the petition. John W. Steinmetz, David Thomas Ryan and Craig A. Raabe, in opposition.
“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff’s amendments to his complaint did not enlarge the existing issues or present new issues of fact so as to entitle him to claim a jury trial pursuant to General Statutes § 52-215?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15248.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
679 A.2d 352 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
657 A.2d 642, 233 Conn. 905, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flint-v-national-railroad-passenger-corp-conn-1995.