Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

657 A.2d 642, 233 Conn. 905, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 153
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 24, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 162 (AC 12907), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[906]*906Decided April 24, 1995 William F. Gallagher and Cynthia C. Bott, in support of the petition. John W. Steinmetz, David Thomas Ryan and Craig A. Raabe, in opposition.
“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff’s amendments to his complaint did not enlarge the existing issues or present new issues of fact so as to entitle him to claim a jury trial pursuant to General Statutes § 52-215?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15248.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., 657 A.2d 642, 233 Conn. 905, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 153 (Colo. 1995).

657 A.2d 642 (Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
679 A.2d 352 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)