Flint v. Morehouse

New York Supreme Court

Flint v. Morehouse

2 How. Pr. 4

DecidedDecember 15, 1845

StatusPublished

This text of 2 How. Pr. 4 (Flint v. Morehouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flint v. Morehouse, 2 How. Pr. 4 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

Jewett, Justice.

Overruled the defendant’s objection to the insufficiency of plaintiff’s affidavit. And as to the replication of a new promise *after defendant became of

full age; the judge said it could not be necessary or proper, as the intestate was shown to have died long before the defendant was of the age of twenty-one years; he however granted the motion, so far as to allow the plaintiff to reply double, only to the plea of the statute of limitations.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jewett, Justice.

Overruled the defendant’s objection to the insufficiency of plaintiff’s affidavit. And as to the replication of a new promise *after defendant became of

full age; the judge said it could not be necessary or proper, as the intestate was shown to have died long before the defendant was of the age of twenty-one years; he however granted the motion, so far as to allow the plaintiff to reply double, only to the plea of the statute of limitations.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 How. Pr. 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flint-v-morehouse-nysupct-1845.