Flint River Pecan Co. v. Waters

Supreme Court of Georgia

Flint River Pecan Co. v. Waters

126 S.E. 775, 159 Ga. 682, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 37

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 14, 1925

DocketNo. 4167

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 126 S.E. 775 (Flint River Pecan Co. v. Waters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flint River Pecan Co. v. Waters, 126 S.E. 775, 159 Ga. 682, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 37 (Ga. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

The ruling made in tlie ease of Scott v. Flint River Pecan Company, this day decided, being controlling of the' present case, the court erred in making the mandamus absolute. The above ruling- being controlling of the case, the question whether an issue of fact was raised by the evidence, and whether the trial judge could pass upon such issue of fact and make the mandamus absolute in vacation, need not be determined. Judgment reversed.

All the Justice concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

The ruling made in tlie ease of Scott v. Flint River Pecan Company, this day decided, being controlling of the' present case, the court erred in making the mandamus absolute. The above ruling- being controlling of the case, the question whether an issue of fact was raised by the evidence, and whether the trial judge could pass upon such issue of fact and make the mandamus absolute in vacation, need not be determined. Judgment reversed.

All the Justice concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 S.E. 775, 159 Ga. 682, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flint-river-pecan-co-v-waters-ga-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack