Flinn v. Miller
This text of 35 Misc. 803 (Flinn v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is distinguishable from Brooks v. Mortimer, 10 App. Div. 518. In that case' the grocer’s bills were made out to the purveyor, and the purveyor’s personal checks given in payment thereof. In the case at bar, while the dealings continued for some years, plaintiff’s bills were always made out, and, in some instances, mailed by the plaintiff to the defendant in [804]*804his own name, and the mere fact of the coachman coming with the money to pay the same was not a circumstance at variance with every day dealings, and could not constitute notice sufficient to put plaintiff upon inquiry.
Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Misc. 803, 72 N.Y.S. 1102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flinn-v-miller-nyappterm-1901.