Flihan v. Mutch
179 A.D.2d 1008
Opinion
Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We conclude from our review of the record that there is sufficient evidence to raise a triable issue of fact whether plaintiff June Flihan suffered a "serious injury” within the meaning of the No-Fault Law (see, Francis v Basic Metal, 144 AD2d 634, 635). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Shaheen, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Flihan v. Mutch, 179 A.D.2d 1008 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
179 A.D.2d 1008 (Flihan v. Mutch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Francis v. Basic Metal Inc.
144 A.D.2d 634 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)