Flieger v. State

987 S.W.2d 514, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 294
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 9, 1999·No. No. 74365·Published

Opinion

[515] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Robert Flieger (“movant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis City denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to RSMo section 547.360 (Cum.Supp.1997). In his prior appeal, State v. Flieger, 776 S.W.2d 25 (Mo.App. E.D.1989), we affirmed movant’s conviction and denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flieger v. State, 987 S.W.2d 514, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 294 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

987 S.W.2d 514 (Flieger v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Flieger
776 S.W.2d 25 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1989)