Flieger v. State
This text of 987 S.W.2d 514 (Flieger v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[515]*515ORDER
Appellant, Robert Flieger (“movant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis City denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to RSMo section 547.360 (Cum.Supp.1997). In his prior appeal, State v. Flieger, 776 S.W.2d 25 (Mo.App. E.D.1989), we affirmed movant’s conviction and denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
987 S.W.2d 514, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flieger-v-state-moctapp-1999.