Flickinger v. State
This text of 636 So. 2d 601 (Flickinger v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appearing that appellant’s probation was improperly revoked because the state failed to establish at the probation revocation hearing that the defendant committed, as charged, a new offense subsequent to being placed on probation (there being no evidence adduced as to when the new offense was committed) see and compare Stafford v. State, 465 So.2d 385 (Fla.1984), the order revoking same is reversed and the matter is returned to the trial court with directions to reestablish the probation.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
636 So. 2d 601, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4988, 1994 WL 201272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flickinger-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.