Flick v. Allegheny County
This text of 172 A. 8 (Flick v. Allegheny County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from refusal of the court below to award a new trial in an action of trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Appellant claims to have been thrown from the rumble seat of an automobile on the night of December 14, 1929, on the road between the towns of Heidelberg and Mount Lebanon in Allegheny County, at a point near a bridge across Chartiers Creek, and asserts the accident was caused by the car’s striking *34 a hole in the road which defendant county negligently failed to repair. The jury’s verdict was for defendant.
The principal questions raised in the ten assignments of error submitted by appellant relate to the charge of the learned judge of the court below. There was a conflict in testimony as to whether or not the roadway, an improved county highway, was defective at the place of the accident in that a hole, or depression, 3% feet long, three feet wide, and five inches deep, was permitted to exist in the cartway for a considerable time before the accident. In the circumstances, a clear-cut question of fact was raised for the jury, and we are of opinion the issue was submitted to them in a charge which was both comprehensive and impartial.
Discussion of the other assignments of error is unnecessary. We have examined them fully and find no reversible error in the case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 A. 8, 315 Pa. 33, 1934 Pa. LEXIS 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flick-v-allegheny-county-pa-1934.