Fleury v. Roger

9 How. Pr. 215
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedMay 15, 1852
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 How. Pr. 215 (Fleury v. Roger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fleury v. Roger, 9 How. Pr. 215 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1852).

Opinion

Bosworth, J.

Held the case under advisement a few days, and ordered the answer to be stricken out as sham and frivolous, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Armstrong Cork & Insulation Co. v. Pirone
135 Misc. 819 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 How. Pr. 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleury-v-roger-nysuperctnyc-1852.