Fleury v. Glens Falls Insurance
This text of 206 A.D. 682 (Fleury v. Glens Falls Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The plaintiff’s agreement with her vendee to assume loss by fire is not a part of the contract of insurance, and does not nullify the operation of the clause in the contract of insurance which declares the policy void if the interest of the insured be other than unconditional and sole ownership. Such ownership was not in the plaintiff at the time the policy was issued. (Brighton Beach Racing Association v. Home Ins. Co., 113 App. Div. 728; affd., 189 N. Y. 526.) Present — Kelly, P. J. Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 A.D. 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleury-v-glens-falls-insurance-nyappdiv-1923.