Fleury v. Glens Falls Insurance

206 A.D. 682

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The plaintiff’s agreement with her vendee to assume loss by fire is not a part of the contract of insurance, and does not nullify the operation of the clause in the contract of insurance which declares the policy void if the interest of the insured be other than unconditional and sole ownership. Such ownership was not in the plaintiff at the time the policy was issued. (Brighton Beach Racing Association v. Home Ins. Co., 113 App. Div. 728; affd., 189 N. Y. 526.) Present — Kelly, P. J. Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fleury v. Glens Falls Insurance, 206 A.D. 682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

206 A.D. 682 (Fleury v. Glens Falls Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brighton Beach Racing Association v. . Home Insurance Co.
82 N.E. 1124 (New York Court of Appeals, 1907)
Brighton Beach Racing Ass'n v. Home Insurance
113 A.D. 728 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)