Fleurot v. Fletcher
This text of 8 Ohio N.P. 318 (Fleurot v. Fletcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition in this case alleges that plaintiff loaned defendant $15,000 for a term of three years, receiving as security a deed in fee simple [319]*319to certain real estate, giving a lease back to ■defendants; that said loan has not been repaid, and that, therefore, he prays a foreclosure and sale of said property, the deed being in fact a mortgage. The defendants demur, because—
1. The petition discloses upon its face a defect of parties.
2. The petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The demurrer must be sustained upon the first ground. The petition shows that George G. Fleurot is the record owner of the estate in fee simple. As a reformation of the deed and lease is sought, so as to make it a mortgage, a foreclosure of the same without making the grantee's wife a party, would not bar her after her husband’s death, to disavow the decision and ■claim that the transaction was an absolute conveyance to her husband. It follows, therefore, that she is a necessary party to make title under this proceeding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Ohio N.P. 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleurot-v-fletcher-ohctcomplhamilt-1901.