Fleurot v. Fletcher

18 Ohio C.C. Dec. 841
Hamilton Circuit Court·Decided March 2, 1903·Published

Opinion

SWING, J.

The petition in this case alleged that plaintiff loaned defendants $15,000 for a term of three years, receiving as security a deed in fee ■simple to certain real estate, and giving a lease back to the defendants; that the said loan had not been repaid, and that the deed was in fact a mortgage; and praying for a foreclosure and sale of the said property.

The motion to dismiss the appeal in this case should be overruled. Plaintiff’s cause of action is purely equitable. No right to a jury existed. The right to have the deed declared a mortgage and the right to have the transaction declared a loan for $15,000 was wholly within the jurisdiction of a court of equity, and could not be tried to a jury. Whether or not a case is appealable depends upon the relief sought, and here it is equitable.

Jelke and Giffen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fleurot v. Fletcher, 18 Ohio C.C. Dec. 841 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1903).

18 Ohio C.C. Dec. 841 (Fleurot v. Fletcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.