Fleurot v. Durand

New York Supreme Court

Fleurot v. Durand

14 Johns. 329

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 15, 1817

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 14 Johns. 329 (Fleurot v. Durand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fleurot v. Durand, 14 Johns. 329 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1817).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There appears to be no established rule of practice in this respect. As the particulars of the plaintiff’s may be deemed as part of his declaration, we think it the proper course for the defendant to move for judgment, as in case of non pros, for want of the bill of particulars, as he might have done for want of a declaration. We, therefore, grant the rule that the plaintiff furnish to the defendant the particulars of his demand, in twenty days, or that a judgment of non pros be entered.

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There appears to be no established rule of practice in this respect. As the particulars of the plaintiff’s may be deemed as part of his declaration, we think it the proper course for the defendant to move for judgment, as in case of non pros, for want of the bill of particulars, as he might have done for want of a declaration. We, therefore, grant the rule that the plaintiff furnish to the defendant the particulars of his demand, in twenty days, or that a judgment of non pros be entered.

Rule granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Johns. 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleurot-v-durand-nysupct-1817.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack