Fleurime v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fleurime v. State

537 S.W.3d 405

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 16, 2018

DocketWD 80340

StatusPublished

This text of 537 S.W.3d 405 (Fleurime v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fleurime v. State, 537 S.W.3d 405 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Per curiam:

Appellant Siril Fleurime (“Fleurime”) is appealing the denial of his Amended Rule 24.035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. Fleurime sought to vacate his guilty plea and sentence for a class A felony of domestic assault in the first degree, section 565.072, and armed criminal action, section 571.015. Fleurime’s 24.035 motion alleges that his statements at his plea hearing called into question whether he acted “knowingly” when he committed the offenses. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per curiam:

Appellant Siril Fleurime (“Fleurime”) is appealing the denial of his Amended Rule 24.035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. Fleurime sought to vacate his guilty plea and sentence for a class A felony of domestic assault in the first degree, section 565.072, and armed criminal action, section 571.015. Fleurime’s 24.035 motion alleges that his statements at his plea hearing called into question whether he acted “knowingly” when he committed the offenses. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

537 S.W.3d 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleurime-v-state-moctapp-2018.