Fletcher v. Village of Victor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fletcher v. Village of Victor

243 A.D. 676

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 676 (Fletcher v. Village of Victor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fletcher v. Village of Victor, 243 A.D. 676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for a reargument denied, with ten dollars costs; motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Memorandum: The dismissal of the complaint after the coming in of the jury verdict for plaintiff was on the merits. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 482.) We found no evidence in the record of negligence in defendant upon which a verdict for plaintiff could be based. (Bryant v. Village of Potsdam,, 253 N. Y. 524.) Therefore, we affirmed the judgment as rendered, the plaintiff not having objected to the reservation of decision on the motion to dismiss the complaint and not having been prejudiced by the granting of the motion to dismiss after rather than before the jury rendered the general verdict. (Glennon v. Eiie Railroad Company, 86 App. Div. 397, 400; affd., 180 N. Y. 562.) (See, also, Gunn v. Lackawanna Steel Co., 177 App. Div. 277; affd., 226 N. Y. 651.) Order entered January 4, 1935.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for a reargument denied, with ten dollars costs; motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Memorandum: The dismissal of the complaint after the coming in of the jury verdict for plaintiff was on the merits. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 482.) We found no evidence in the record of negligence in defendant upon which a verdict for plaintiff could be based. (Bryant v. Village of Potsdam,, 253 N. Y. 524.) Therefore, we affirmed the judgment as rendered, the plaintiff not having objected to the reservation of decision on the motion to dismiss the complaint and not having been prejudiced by the granting of the motion to dismiss after rather than before the jury rendered the general verdict. (Glennon v. Eiie Railroad Company, 86 App. Div. 397, 400; affd., 180 N. Y. 562.) (See, also, Gunn v. Lackawanna Steel Co., 177 App. Div. 277; affd., 226 N. Y. 651.) Order entered January 4, 1935.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fletcher-v-village-of-victor-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack