Fletcher v. U.S. Department of Education

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedSeptember 30, 2013
DocketCivil Action No. 2011-1943
StatusPublished

This text of Fletcher v. U.S. Department of Education (Fletcher v. U.S. Department of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fletcher v. U.S. Department of Education, (D.D.C. 2013).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DEBORAH DIANE FLETCHER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civ. Action No. 11-1943 (ABJ) ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff Deborah Diane Fletcher filed this action asking that a student loan debt owed to

the Department of Education be discharged due to her disability. See Compl. [Dkt. 1]. The

government has now officially declared that the debt has been discharged, and it has moved for

summary judgment on the basis that this case is moot. See Def’s Motion for Summary Judgment

[Dkt. 20]. In support of summary judgment, the government has filed a sworn declaration from a

Loan Analyst at the Department of Education which clearly states that any student loan debts

have been discharged and that Ms. Fletcher does not owe any balance. Ex. 1 to Def’s Motion,

Decl. of Lynda Faatalale ¶ 3.

In her response to the instant motion, Ms. Fletcher states: “the fact that the loans were

drop[ped] is something I was [hoping] for at the end of this case.” Motion and Summary [Dkt. #

22] at 2. She is now “asking for [a] judgment” in the amount of $12 million. Id. Ms. Fletcher

has obtained the only relief sought from the complaint, i.e., the discharge of her student loan

1 debt. Hence, the Court will grant defendant’s summary judgment motion on mootness grounds

and will dismiss this case.

Also pending is Ms. Fletcher’s motion filed on May 3, 2013, for a “Default Resolution

Letter” [Dkt. # 16]. Defendant opposed the motion on the basis that it was premature, stating

that the relief sought “would only be available were plaintiff to succeed in this action.” Mem. in

Opp’n to Pl.’s Request for a Default Resolution Letter [Dkt. # 17]. Subsequently, the

Department of Education officially informed this court that the debt had been discharged, and it

supplied the Court and Ms. Fletcher with a sworn declaration that clearly states: “As of the date

of this declaration, Deborah D. Fletcher has a $0.00 balance owing on these debts.” [Dkt. 20-1].

Therefore, the Court finds that Ms. Fletcher has received the documentation she sought in her

motion, and it will deny the motion as moot as well.

A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

___________s/___________ AMY BERMAN JACKSON United States District Judge DATE: September 30, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Fletcher v. U.S. Department of Education, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fletcher-v-us-department-of-education-dcd-2013.