Fletcher v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Fletcher v. United States

9 F. Cas. 275, 1 Hayw. & H.D.C. 200, 1844 U.S. App. LEXIS 425, 1844 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedJune 4, 1844

DocketCase No. 4,869

StatusPublished

This text of 9 F. Cas. 275 (Fletcher v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fletcher v. United States, 9 F. Cas. 275, 1 Hayw. & H.D.C. 200, 1844 U.S. App. LEXIS 425, 1844 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40 (circtddc 1844).

Pincite

Opinion

The jury rendered a verdict of guilty as indicted, and the prisoner was sentenced by the court to imprisonment and labor. The prisoner pleaded autrefois convict. The prisoner, through his counsel, submitted the record of a former trial and verdict of guilty, and of an entry of a nolle prosequi in the case on the rendition of said verdict, no judgment having at any time been pronounced by.the court on said verdict The prisoner having pleaded autrefois convict, and asked the court to instruct the jury that the prisoner, under the said plea and the said record, . is entitled to an acquittal, which instructions the court refused to give. The prisoner thereupon excepted, and prayed the court to sign and seal his bill of exceptions.

On argument by counsel on the questions of law, and being duly considered by the court, it is thereupon considered by the court that the said criminal court erred in refusing to give the instructions prayed by the traverser, as appears by the bill of exceptions, and the court, being of opinion that the prior conviction and nolle prosequi therein referred to were a good and sufficient bar to the prosecution, do order and adjudge that the cause be remanded, witn directions to arrest the judgment thereon, and that the prisoner be discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The jury rendered a verdict of guilty as indicted, and the prisoner was sentenced by the court to imprisonment and labor. The prisoner pleaded autrefois convict. The prisoner, through his counsel, submitted the record of a former trial and verdict of guilty, and of an entry of a nolle prosequi in the case on the rendition of said verdict, no judgment having at any time been pronounced by.the court on said verdict The prisoner having pleaded autrefois convict, and asked the court to instruct the jury that the prisoner, under the said plea and the said record, . is entitled to an acquittal, which instructions the court refused to give. The prisoner thereupon excepted, and prayed the court to sign and seal his bill of exceptions.

On argument by counsel on the questions of law, and being duly considered by the court, it is thereupon considered by the court that the said criminal court erred in refusing to give the instructions prayed by the traverser, as appears by the bill of exceptions, and the court, being of opinion that the prior conviction and nolle prosequi therein referred to were a good and sufficient bar to the prosecution, do order and adjudge that the cause be remanded, witn directions to arrest the judgment thereon, and that the prisoner be discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 F. Cas. 275, 1 Hayw. & H.D.C. 200, 1844 U.S. App. LEXIS 425, 1844 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fletcher-v-united-states-circtddc-1844.