Fletcher v. Townsend

230 F.2d 946
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 9, 1956·No. Nos. 12537, 12538·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these companion cases arising out of a judgment rendered upon a jury verdict in an action for personal injuries sustained in a collision between a passenger automobile and a truck, the District Court, after oral hearing and consideration of depositions and affidavits, sustained a motion for new trial for alleged misconduct of jurors;

And it appearing that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in granting such motion; Stiles v. Lawrie, 6 Cir., 211 F.2d 188, 190; Losey v. Creamer, 45 Ohio App. 356, 187 N.E. 197.

And no reversible error appearing in the record;

The order of the District Court entered January 27, 1955, is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fletcher v. Townsend, 230 F.2d 946 (6th Cir. 1956).

230 F.2d 946 (Fletcher v. Townsend) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stiles v. Lawrie
211 F.2d 188 (Sixth Circuit, 1954)
Losey v. Creamer
187 N.E. 197 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1933)