Fletcher v. Townsend

230 F.2d 946
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 9, 1956
DocketNos. 12537, 12538
StatusPublished

This text of 230 F.2d 946 (Fletcher v. Townsend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fletcher v. Townsend, 230 F.2d 946 (6th Cir. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these companion cases arising out of a judgment rendered upon a jury verdict in an action for personal injuries sustained in a collision between a passenger automobile and a truck, the District Court, after oral hearing and consideration of depositions and affidavits, sustained a motion for new trial for alleged misconduct of jurors;

And it appearing that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in granting such motion; Stiles v. Lawrie, 6 Cir., 211 F.2d 188, 190; Losey v. Creamer, 45 Ohio App. 356, 187 N.E. 197.

And no reversible error appearing in the record;

The order of the District Court entered January 27, 1955, is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stiles v. Lawrie
211 F.2d 188 (Sixth Circuit, 1954)
Losey v. Creamer
187 N.E. 197 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 F.2d 946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fletcher-v-townsend-ca6-1956.