Fletcher v. State

110 S.E. 748, 28 Ga. App. 230, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 413
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 14, 1922
Docket13179
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 S.E. 748 (Fletcher v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fletcher v. State, 110 S.E. 748, 28 Ga. App. 230, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 413 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial is not referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and therefore is treated as abandoned.

2. The defendant’s conviction was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cordovano v. State
7 S.E.2d 45 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 748, 28 Ga. App. 230, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fletcher-v-state-gactapp-1922.