Fletcher v. State
110 S.E. 748, 28 Ga. App. 230, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 413
Opinion
1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial is not referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and therefore is treated as abandoned.
2. The defendant’s conviction was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fletcher v. State, 110 S.E. 748, 28 Ga. App. 230, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 413 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
110 S.E. 748 (Fletcher v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cordovano v. State
7 S.E.2d 45 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)