Fletcher v. State

949 So. 2d 328, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2609, 2007 WL 543008
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fletcher v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 890 So. 2d 1167
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 23, 2007·No. No. 5D06-4176·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George Fletcher appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the trial court’s decision because the motion was not made under oath as required. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(c). Thus, we affirm without prejudice for Fletcher to file a new, properly sworn motion that contains factual allegations. See Gonzalez v. State, 869 So.2d 775 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Creel v. State, 769 So.2d 450 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Linton v. State, 721 So.2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Van Aernam v. State, 715 So.2d 1143 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Saba v. State, 677 So.2d 41 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fletcher v. State, 949 So. 2d 328, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2609, 2007 WL 543008 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

949 So. 2d 328 (Fletcher v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gonzalez v. State
869 So. 2d 775 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Saba v. State
677 So. 2d 41 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Van Aernam v. State
715 So. 2d 1143 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Creel v. State
769 So. 2d 450 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Linton v. State
721 So. 2d 743 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)