Fletcher v. Star Creek Apartment Manager

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided November 19, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2012-1878·Published

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

F0R THE DISTRICT oF C0LUMB1A NOV l 9 299

C|ark, U.S. Dist_rict & Bankruptcy

DEBORAH DIANE FLETCHER’ ) COUUS f0f file U|Sf|'lCf Of Columh|a ) Plaintiff, ) )

. C' 'l A ' N . v g 1v1 ct1on 0 8 STAR CREEK APARTMENT ) MANAGER, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

The plaintiff has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed.

Plaintiff brings this action to recover a security deposit paid to her former landlord in Miami, Florida. Federal district courts have jurisdiction in civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 133 l. In addition, federal district courts have jurisdiction over civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000, and the suit is between citizens of different states. See 28 U.S.C. § l332(a). This complaint sets forth no federal question. Although the parties appear to be citizens of different states, the matter in controversy does not exceed the $75,000 threshold. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction An Order consistent with this

Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

DATE= %.O.e,,¢a 103 1@,}_

/Unit€d States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fletcher v. Star Creek Apartment Manager, (D.D.C. 2012).

Fletcher v. Star Creek Apartment Manager (Fletcher v. Star Creek Apartment Manager) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related